Tumor pseudopapilar sólido de páncreas, una neoplasia inusual / Solid Pseudopapillary Tumor of the Pancreas, an Unusual Neoplasm

Presentación del caso. Se trata de una mujer de 26 años que presentó dolor en epigastrio e hipocondrio izquierdo, con aumento del perímetro abdominal y pérdida de 5 kg de peso corporal. En el examen físico se detectó una masa de gran tamaño en el epigastrio, con bordes regulares, ligeramente dolorosa al tacto y no móvil. Los estudios de imagen revelaron una neoplasia mixta en el cuerpo y cola pancreática. Intervención terapéutica. Se practicó una esplenopancreatectomía corpo-caudal, con extirpación completa del tumor. Evolución clínica. La paciente recibió cuidados especializados y vigilancia estrecha posquirúrgica en la unidad de cuidados intensivos, sin presentar complicaciones relevantes. Tras el alta hospitalaria, la paciente refirió un buen estado general en los controles de seguimiento, que incluyeron una tomografía realizada a los 12 meses, donde no se evidenciaron restos o recidivas tumorales

Case presentation. A 26-year-old woman who presented with pain in the epigastrium and left hypochondrium, with increased abdominal perimeter and loss of 5 kg of body weight. Physical examination revealed a large mass in the epigastrium, with regular borders, slightly painful to the touch and non-mobile. Imaging studies revealed a mixed neoplasm in the pancreatic body and tail. Treatment. A corpo-caudal splenopancreatectomy was performed, with complete removal of the tumor. Outcome. The patient received specialized care and close postoperative surveillance in the intensive care unit, with no relevant complications. After hospital discharge, the patient reported a good general condition in the follow-up controls, which included a computed tomography scan performed after 12 months, where no tumor remnants or recurrences were evidenced

Neoplasia mucinosa papilar intraductal del páncreas: características clínico-patológicas y supervivencia a largo plazo de pacientes sometidos a pancreatectomía / Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of pancreas: clinicopathological features and long-term survival after surgical resection

Introducción La neoplasia mucinosa papilar intraductal (NMPI) del páncreas puede progresar de displasia de bajo grado a displasia de alto grado y carcinoma invasivo asociado. El objetivo de este trabajo fue describir las características clínico-patológicas y los resultados de seguimiento a largo plazo de pacientes con pancreatectomía por NMPI. Métodos En este estudio retrospectivo de un solo centro, se analizan los resultados de los pacientes sometidos a resección pancreática, con diagnóstico anatomopatológico de NMPI, desde enero del 2009 a diciembre del 2019. Resultados Un total de 31 pacientes tuvieron diagnóstico de NMPI. Nueve pacientes fueron varones y 22 mujeres. La edad media fue de 67 años. Veintisiete pacientes (87%) presentaron síntomas. Los estigmas de alto riesgo se encontraron en 20 pacientes (64,5%) y las características preocupantes («worrisome features») en 10 pacientes (32,2%). Siete pacientes tuvieron NMPI tipo conducto principal, 13 NMPI tipo rama y 11 NMPI tipo mixto. El carcinoma invasivo asociado estuvo presente en 13 pacientes (41,9%), la displasia de alto grado en 4 pacientes (12,9%) y la displasia de bajo grado en 14 pacientes (45,2%). El tiempo de seguimiento fue de 2 a 12 años. La supervivencia media de los pacientes con NMPI y carcinoma invasivo asociado fue de 45,8 meses y la supervivencia libre de enfermedad de estos pacientes fue de 40,8 meses. Conclusiones En nuestros pacientes operados, la NMPI tuvo mayor prevalencia en mujeres, fue predominantemente sintomática y tuvo una elevada incidencia de carcinoma invasivo asociado a las de tipo rama. La supervivencia a 5 años fue buena aun con carcinoma invasivo asociado. (AU)

Introduction Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of pancreas can progress from low grade dysplasia to high grade dysplasia and invasive carcinoma. Methods in this single center retrospective series we analyze the clinicopathological features and long-term follow up of patients who underwent pancreatic resection for IPMN, from January 2009 to December 2019. Results 31 patients were diagnosed with IPMN. Nine males and 22 females. The mean age was 67 years. Twenty-seven patients (87%) were symptomatic. Seven patients had main duct IPMN, 11 branch type IPMN and 13 mixed type IPMN. High-risk stigmata were found in 20 patients (64.5%) and worrisome features in 10 patients (32.2%). Thirteen patients (41.9%) had an associated invasive carcinoma, 4 (12.9%) high-grade dysplasia and 14 (45.2%) low-grade dysplasia. The follow-up was from 2 to 12 years. Median survival for patients with IPMN and associated invasive carcinoma was 45.8 months and disease-free survival was 40.8 months. Conclusions IPMN had higher prevalence in females, mostly symptomatic and high incidence of associated invasive carcinoma with branch type. The 5-year survival was good even with associated invasive carcinoma. (AU)

Experiencia en la resección del proceso uncinado del páncreas: indicaciones y resultados. Revisión de la literatura / Experience in the resection of the uncinate process of the pancreas: Indications and results. Literature review

Introducción: El objetivo de nuestro trabajo es evaluar la experiencia acumulada en el empleo de la uncinectomía (UC) como técnica de pancreatectomía conservadora de parénquima. Método: Estudio observacional y descriptivo que incluye retrospectivamente todos los pacientes intervenidos mediante la técnica de UC en Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge (HUB), y revisión exhaustiva de los casos descritos en la literatura inglesa hasta la actualidad. Resultados: Desde el 2003 hasta el 2019 han sido intervenidos siete pacientes mediante UC en el HUB con orientación diagnóstica de lesión pancreática considerada premaligna. Todos los pacientes han presentado morbilidad, fundamentalmente en forma de fístula pancreática postoperatoria y ninguno de ellos ha presentado insuficiencia pancreática endocrina ni exocrina. Actualmente todos los pacientes se encuentran vivos y sin recidiva de enfermedad neoplásica. Otros 29 casos han sido descritos en la literatura. Del total de los casos (36 pacientes), el abordaje ha sido mínimamente invasivo (laparoscópico o robotizado) en seis pacientes (16,7%), conllevando una estancia hospitalaria inferior. La incidencia global de fístula pancreática es del 50% comportando una tasa de reingreso inferior al 10%, pero sin necesitar reintervención. Conclusión: La UC es una técnica infrecuente y poco estandarizada para la resección de lesiones benignas o de bajo potencial de malignidad localizadas en el proceso uncinado del páncreas. Aunque se asocia a una morbilidad igual o superior a las técnicas de resección estandarizadas, ofrece una preservación excelente de la función endocrina y exocrina pancreática, con el consiguiente beneficio en la calidad de vida de los pacientes a largo plazo. (AU)

Introduction: The aim of our study is to assess the accumulated experience in the use of uncinatectomy (UC) as a parenchymal-sparing pancreatectomy technique. Method: We have carried out a observational and descriptive study including restrospectively all the patients undergoing UC at Hospital Universitary de Bellvitge (HUB) and an exhaustive review of the cases described in the english literature. Results: From 2003 to 2019, seven patients have been operated by UC in the HUB with a diagnostic orientation of pancreatic lesion considered premalignant. All patients have presented morbidity, mainly in the form of postoperative pancreatic fistula, and none of them have presented endocrine or exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. Currently, all patients are alive and without recurrence of neoplastic disease. Another 29 cases have been described in the literature. Of all the cases (36 patients), the approach was minimally invasive (laparoscopic or robotic) in 6 patients (16.7%), leading to a shorter hospital stay. The global incidence of pancreatic fistula is 50%, with a re-admission rate of less than 10%, but without requiring re-intervention. Conclusion: UC is an infrequent and poorly standardized technique for the resection of benign lesions or those with low potential for malignancy located in the uncinate process of the pancreas. Although it is associated with equal or greater morbidity than standardized resection techniques, it offers excellent preservation of endocrine and exocrine pancreatic function, with the consequent long-term benefit in the patients life quality. (AU)

Quiste hidatídico primario de páncreas: reporte de caso

Introducción. El quiste hidatídico puede localizarse en cualquier órgano del cuerpo. El quiste hidatídico en el páncreas (QHP)se presenta con una prevalencia menor a 1%, la localización más frecuente es la cabeza en 61% a 69%, en el cuerpo y cola en 31% a 39%. No es fácil diferenciar el quiste hidatídico pancreático de otros tumores quísticos del páncreas, por lo que esta patología debe tenerse en cuenta en el diagnóstico diferencial de lesiones quísticas pancreáticas. Caso Clínico. Paciente femenino de 66 años quien desde el año 2016 se encontraba en control por una tumoración quística de la cola pancreática de 1,7 cm, diagnosticada en forma incidental. La paciente cursó asintomática y se controló en forma anual. El año 2021 la lesión alcanzó un tamaño de 4,7 cm. En este contexto se decide la resección quirúrgica por vía laparoscópica. Se resecó una pieza quirúrgica de 8 cm de longitud que incluye la cola del páncreas y el quiste. La histología describe la membrana prolígera y múltiples escólex viables. Conclusión. La localización primaria en la cola del páncreas de un quiste hidatídico confunde el diagnóstico con un tumor quístico mucinoso. El tratamiento quirúrgico actual en los quistes distales debería ser la resección laparoscópica.

Introduction. The hydatid cyst can be located in any organ of the body. The hydatid cyst in the pancreas occurs with a prevalence of less than 1%, the most frequent location is the head in 61% to 69%, the body and tail in 31% to 39%. It is not easy to differentiate the pancreatic hydatid cyst from other cystic tumors of the pancreas, so this pathology must be taken into account in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions. Clinical Case. The present report discusses a 66-year-old female patient who had been in control since 2016 for a 1.7 cm cystic tumor of the pancreatic tail. The patient was asymptomatic and was controlled annually. In 2021, the lesion reached a size of 4.7 cm. In this context, laparoscopic surgical resection was decided. An 8 cm long surgical specimen was resected, including the tail of the pancreas and the cyst. Histology describes prolific membrane and multiple viable scolexes. Conclusion. The primary location in the tail of the pancreas of a hydatid cyst confuses the diagnosis with a mucinous cystic tumor. The current surgical treatment for distal cysts should be laparoscopic resection.

Predictors of postoperative complications and readmissions in laparoscopic pancreas resection: Results of a cohort 105 consecutive cases. A retrospective study / Factores predictivos de complicaciones postoperatorias y reingresos en resecciones laparoscópicas de páncreas: resultados en una cohorte de 105 casos consecutivos. Estudio retrospectivo

Introduction: Laparoscopic resection of the pancreas (LRP) has been implemented to a varying degree because it is technically demanding and requires a long learning curve. In the present study we analyze the risk factors for complications and hospital readmissions in a single center study of 105 consecutive LRPs. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study using a prospective database. Data were collected on age, gender, BMI, ASA score, type of surgery, histologic type, operative time, hospital stay, postoperative complications, degree of severity and hospital readmission. Results: The cohort included 105 patients, 63 females and 42 males with a median age and BMI of 58 (53–70) and 25.5 (22,2–27.9) respectively. Eighteen (17%) central pancreatectomies, 5 (4.8%) enucleations, 81 (77.6%) distal pancreatectomies and one total pancreatectomy were performed. Fifty-six patients (53.3%) experienced some type of complication, of which 13 (12.3%) were severe (Clavien-Dindo > IIIb) and 11 (10.5%) patients were readmitted in the first 30 days after surgery. In the univariate analysis, age, male gender, ASA score, central pancreatectomy and operative time were significantly associated with the development of complications (P <0.05). In the multivariate analysis, male gender (OR 7.97; 95% CI 1.08–58.88)), severe complications (OR 59.40; 95% CI, 7.69–458.99), and the development of intrabdominal collections (OR 8.97; 95% CI, 1.28–63.02)) were associated with hospital readmission. Conclusions: Age, male gender, ASA score, operative time and central pancreatectomy are associated with a higher incidence of complications. Male gender, severe complications and intraabdominal collections are associated with more hospital readmissions. (AU)

Introducción: Las resecciones laparoscópicas del páncreas (RLP) tienen un grado de implantación muy heterogéneo debido a su dificultad técnica y a exigir una curva de aprendizaje larga. En el presente trabajo estudiamos los factores de riesgo de las complicaciones y de los reingresos en una serie unicéntrica de 105 RLP. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo. Se recogieron la edad, sexo, índice de masa corporal, el grado ASA, tipo de cirugía, tipo histológico, duración de la intervención, estancia hospitalaria, las complicaciones postoperatorias, grado de gravedad y reingreso. Resultados: La cohorte comprende 105 pacientes, 63 mujeres y 42 varones, con una mediana de edad y IMC, de 58 (53–70) y 25.5 (22.2–25.5) respectivamente. Se realizaron 18 (17%) pancreatectomias centrales, 81 (77%) distales, 5 (4.8%) enucleaciones y una total. 56 (53.3%) pacientes sufrieron alguna complicación, 13 (12.3%) fueron graves (Clavien-Dindo > IIIb) y hubo 11 (10.5%) reingresos. En el análisis univariante, la edad, el sexo masculino, el grado ASA, la pancreatectomía central y el tiempo operatorio se asociaban significativamente con el desarrollo de complicaciones (P < 0.05). En el análisis multivariante, los varones (OR 7.97; 95% IC 1.08–58.8), las complicaciones severas (OR 59.40; 95% IC 7.69–458.9), el desarrollo de colecciones intraabdominales (OR 8.97; 95% IC 1.2–63.0) se asociaban con el reingreso hospitalario. Conclusiones: La edad, el sexo masculino, el grado ASA, la duración de la intervención y la pancreatectomía central se asocian con mayor incidencia de complicaciones. Los varones, las complicaciones graves, las colecciones intraabdominales se asociaban con más reingresos hospitalarios. (AU)

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio on postoperative day three as a biochemical predictor of clinically significant pancreatic fistula in patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy.

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Distal pancreatectomy is a frequent procedure and postoperative fistula, its most common complication, has an incidence of 30 to 60%. The aim of the present work was to study the role of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, as indicators of inflammatory response in the setting of pancreatic fistula. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted on patients that underwent distal pancreatectomy. The diagnosis of postoperative pancreatic fistula was made according to the definition proposed by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula. The relation of postoperative pancreatic fistula to the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio was determined in the postoperative evaluation. SPSS v.21 software was utilized for the statistical analysis and a P<.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients (27.2%) developed grade B or grade C postoperative pancreatic fistula. ROC curves were constructed and a threshold of 8.3 (PPV 0.40, NPV 0.86) was established for the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, with an area under the curve of 0.71, sensitivity of 0.81, and specificity of 0.62, whereas a threshold of 33.2 (PPV 0.50, NPV 0.84) was established for the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, with an area under the curve of 0.72, sensitivity of 0.72, and specificity of 0.71. CONCLUSION: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio are serologic markers that can aid in identifying patients that will present with grade B or grade C postoperative pancreatic fistula, thus helping to provide an opportune focus on care and resources.

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of pancreas: Clinicopathological features and long-term survival after surgical resection.

INTRODUCTION: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas can progress from low-grade dysplasia to high-grade dysplasia and invasive carcinoma. METHODS: In this single-center retrospective series, we analyze the clinicopathological features and long-term follow up of patients who underwent pancreatic resection for IPMN, from January 2009 to December 2019. RESULTS: 31 patients were diagnosed with IPMN: 9 males and 22 females. Mean age was 67 years. Twenty-seven patients (87%) were symptomatic. Seven patients had main duct IPMN, 11 branch-type IPMN and 13 mixed-type IPMN. High-risk stigmata were found in 20 patients (64.5%) and worrisome features in 10 patients (32.2%). Thirteen patients (41.9%) had an associated invasive carcinoma, 4 (12.9%) high-grade dysplasia and 14 (45.2%) low-grade dysplasia. The follow-up was from 2 to 12 years. Median survival for patients with IPMN and associated invasive carcinoma was 45.8 months, and disease-free survival was 40.8 months. CONCLUSIONS: IPMN had a higher prevalence in females, mostly symptomatic and high incidence of associated invasive carcinoma with branch type. The 5-year survival was good even with associated invasive carcinoma.

Predictors of postoperative complications and readmissions in laparoscopic pancreas resection: Results of a cohort 105 consecutive cases. A retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic resection of the pancreas (LRP) has been implemented to a varying degree because it is technically demanding and requires a long learning curve. In the present study we analyze the risk factors for complications and hospital readmissions in a single center study of 105 consecutive LRPs. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study using a prospective database. Data were collected on age, gender, BMI, ASA score, type of surgery, histologic type, operative time, hospital stay, postoperative complications, degree of severity and hospital readmission. RESULTS: The cohort included 105 patients, 63 females and 42 males with a median age and BMI of 58 (53-70) and 25.5 (22,2-27.9) respectively. Eighteen (17%) central pancreatectomies, 5 (4.8%) enucleations, 81 (77.6%) distal pancreatectomies and one total pancreatectomy were performed. Fifty-six patients (53.3%) experienced some type of complication, of which 13 (12.3%) were severe (Clavien-Dindo > IIIb) and 11 (10.5%) patients were readmitted in the first 30 days after surgery. In the univariate analysis, age, male gender, ASA score, central pancreatectomy and operative time were significantly associated with the development of complications (P <0.05). In the multivariate analysis, male gender (OR 7.97; 95% CI 1.08-58.88)), severe complications (OR 59.40; 95% CI, 7.69-458.99), and the development of intrabdominal collections (OR 8.97; 95% CI, 1.28-63.02)) were associated with hospital readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Age, male gender, ASA score, operative time and central pancreatectomy are associated with a higher incidence of complications. Male gender, severe complications and intraabdominal collections are associated with more hospital readmissions.

Experience in the resection of the uncinate process of the pancreas: Indications and results. Literature review.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of our study is to assess the accumulated experience in the use of uncinatectomy (UC) as a parenchymal-sparing pancreatectomy technique. METHOD: We have carried out a observational and descriptive study including restrospectively all the patients undergoing UC at Hospital Universitary de Bellvitge (HUB) and an exhaustive review of the cases described in the english literature. RESULTS: From 2003 to 2019, seven patients have been operated by UC in the HUB with a diagnostic orientation of pancreatic lesion considered premalignant. All patients have presented morbidity, mainly in the form of postoperative pancreatic fistula, and none of them have presented endocrine or exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. Currently, all patients are alive and without recurrence of neoplastic disease. Another 29 cases have been described in the literature. Of all the cases (36 patients), the approach was minimally invasive (laparoscopic or robotic) in 6 patients (16.7%), leading to a shorter hospital stay. The global incidence of pancreatic fistula is 50%, with a re-admission rate of less than 10%, but without requiring re-intervention. CONCLUSIONS: UC is an infrequent and poorly standardized technique for the resection of benign lesions or those with low potential for malignancy located in the uncinate process of the pancreas. Although it is associated with equal or greater morbidity than standardized resection techniques, it offers excellent preservation of endocrine and exocrine pancreatic function, with the consequent long-term benefit in the patients life quality.

Aspectos anatomo-clínicos de un caso de neoplasia sólida seudopapilar de páncreas: (tumor de Frantz) / Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas: (Frantz´s tumor) anatomo-clinical aspects / Aspectos anátomo-clínicos de um caso de neoplasia sólida pseudopapilar do pâncreas: (tumor de Frantz)

El tumor pseudopapilar de páncreas, conocido como tumor de Frantz, es excepcional; comprende entre el 0.2 y 2.7 % de los carcinomas de páncreas. Su etiología es desconocida y predomina en mujeres jóvenes. Son tumores de bajo potencial maligno, que cursan asintomáticos y dan síntomas por compresión regional: dolor gravativo y/o masa abdominal palpable. La probabilidad de una forma definidamente maligna es de 15 %. Anatómicamente se localizan con mayor frecuencia en la cola del páncreas, seguido por la cabeza y el cuerpo. El tratamiento es la resección quirúrgica y su pronóstico es excelente, con sobrevida a 5 años de casi 100 %. El diagnóstico es anátomo-patológico, considerando el aspecto microscópico y el perfil inmunohistoquímico. Se presenta un caso de una mujer de 21 años, en la cual se realizó una cirugía de excéresis completa del tumor y que se mantiene a asintomática a 24 meses de operada.

Pseudo papillary tumor of the pancreas, also called Frantz´s tumor, is a very rare disease; between 0.2 and 2.7 % of pancreatic carcinomas. Ethiology is unknown; is observed in young women. It´s a tumors with low malignant potential, usually of asymptomatic evolution by long time and the symptoms are due to regional compression: pain or abdominal mass. The possibility of a malignant form is around 15 %. Anatomically, they are most frequently located in the tail of the pancreas, followed by the head and body. The treatment is the surgical resection; with an excellent prognosis and a 5-year survival almost 100 %. The diagnosis is with pathological study, considering the microscopic appearance and the immunohistochemical profile. Its perform an analysis of the literature and once case of a 21 years old, woman is reported. A complete resection surgery of the tumor was performed and remains asymptomatic at 24 months of follow-up.

O tumor pseudopapilar do pâncreas, conhecido como tumor de Frantz, é excepcional; compreende entre 0,2 e 2,7 % dos carcinomas pancreáticos. Sua etiologia é desconhecida e predomina em mulheres jovens. São tumores de baixo potencial maligno, que são assintomáticos e apresentam sintomas devido à compressão regional: dor intensa e/ou massa abdominal palpável. A probabilidade de uma forma definitivamente maligna é de 15 %. Anatomicamente, eles estão localizados com mais frequência na cauda do pâncreas, seguido pela cabeça e corpo. O tratamento é a ressecção cirúrgica e seu prognóstico é excelente, com sobrevida em 5 anos de quase 100 %. O diagnóstico é anátomo-patológico, considerando o aspecto microscópico e o perfil imuno-histoquímico. Apresenta-se o caso de uma mulher de 21 anos submetida a cirurgia de excisão completa do tumor e que permanece assintomática 24 meses após a cirurgia.

Robotic assisted versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a retrospective study / Pancreatectomia distal robótica versus laparoscópica: um estudo retrospectivo

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) is associated with less blood loss and faster functional recovery. However, the benefits of robotic assisted distal pancreatectomy (RDP) over laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) are unknown. AIMS: To compare RDP versus LDP for surgical treatment of benign lesions, pre-malignant and borderline malignant pancreatic neoplasias. METHODS: This is a retrospective study comparing LDP with RDP. Main outcomes were overall morbidity and overall costs. Secondary outcomes were pancreatic fistula (PF), infectious complications, readmission, operative time (OT) and length of hospital stay (LOS). RESULTS: Thirty patients submitted to LDP and 29 submitted to RDP were included in the study. There was no difference regarding preoperative characteristics. There was no difference regarding overall complications (RDP - 72,4% versus LDP - 80%, p=0,49). Costs were superior for patients submitted to RDP (RDP=US$ 6,688 versus LDP=US$ 6,149, p=0,02), mostly due to higher costs of surgical materials (RDP=US$ 2,364 versus LDP=1,421, p=0,00005). Twenty-one patients submitted to RDP and 24 to LDP developed pancreatic fistula (PF), but only 4 RDP and 7 LDP experienced infectious complications associated with PF. OT (RDP=224 min. versus LDP=213 min., p=0.36) was similar, as well as conversion to open procedure (1 RDP and 2 LDP). CONCLUSIONS: The postoperative morbidity of robotic distal pancreatectomy is comparable to laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. However, the costs of robotic distal pancreatectomy are slightly higher.

RESUMO RACIONAL: A pancreatectomia distal minimamente invasiva (PDMI) está associada a menos perda sanguínea e recuperação funcional mais rápida, no entanto, os benefícios da pancreatectomia distal robótica (PDR) são desconhecidos quando comparada a pancreatectomia distal laparoscópica (PDL). OBJETIVOS: Comparar PDR versus PDL no tratamento cirúrgico de lesões benignas, neoplasias pancreáticas malignas, pré-malignas e limítrofes. MÉTODOS: Estudo retrospectivo comparando PDL com PDR. Os desfechos primários avaliados foram morbidade e custos hospitalares. Os desfechos secundários foram fístula pancreática (FP), complicações infecciosas, readmissão, tempo cirúrgico e tempo de internação hospitalar (TIH). RESULTADOS: Trinta pacientes submetidos a PDL e 29 submetidos a PDR foram incluídos no estudo. Não houve diferença em relação às características pré-operatórias. Não houve diferença em relação às complicações gerais (PDL - 72,4% versus PRD - 80%, p=0,49). Os custos foram superiores para PDR (PDR=US$ 6688 versus PDL=US$ 6149, p=0,02), principalmente devido aos custos mais elevados de materiais cirúrgicos (PDR=US$ 2364 versus PDL=1421, p=0,00005). Vinte e um pacientes submetidos a PDR e 24 submetidos a PDL desenvolveram fístula pancreática (PF), no entanto, apenas 4 submetidos PDR e 7 a PDL apresentaram complicações infecciosas associadas a FP. O tempo cirúrgico (PDR=224 min. versus PDL=213 min., p=0,36) e a conversão para cirurgia aberta (1 PDR e 2 PDL) não tiveram diferença estatística. CONCLUSÕES: A morbidade pós operatória da pancreatectomia distal robótica é comparável à pancreatectomia distal laparoscópica. Entretando, os custos da pancreatectomia distal robótica são mais elevados.

Giant splenic artery aneurysm: case report / Aneurisma gigante da artéria esplênica: relato de caso

Abstract True splenic artery aneurysms are exceedingly rare and the medical literature contains only a limited number of reports on this pathology. Presently, there remains a lack of consensus regarding the optimal management and treatment approaches for patients in this category. Over the course of the last century, significant changes have occurred in the realm of surgical options, transitioning from open and endovascular procedures to the more advanced laparoscopic and robotic interventions. The propensity for these aneurysms to rupture underscores the need for timely intervention. The risk of rupture is notably elevated in patients harboring giant splenic artery aneurysms. In this report, we present the case of a 55-year-old woman diagnosed with a giant splenic artery aneurysm measuring 12x12 cm in diameter. She presented with notable weakness, discomfort, and pain in the left subcostal area. In response to her complaints and after thorough evaluation, we opted for a surgical procedure encompassing distal pancreatic resection in conjunction with splenectomy and resection of the giant splenic artery aneurysm.

Resumo Os aneurismas verdadeiros da artéria esplênica são extremamente raros, e há um número limitado de relatos sobre essa condição na literatura médica. Atualmente, não há consenso sobre as abordagens ideais de manejo e tratamento para pacientes que se enquadram nessa categoria. Ao longo do século passado, ocorreram mudanças significativas no domínio das opções cirúrgicas, passando de procedimentos abertos e endovasculares para intervenções laparoscópicas e robóticas mais avançadas. A propensão à ruptura do aneurisma ressalta a necessidade de intervenção em tempo oportuno. O risco de ruptura é notavelmente elevado em pacientes com aneurismas gigantes da artéria esplênica. Neste relato, apresentamos o caso de uma mulher de 55 anos diagnosticada com aneurisma gigante de artéria esplênica medindo 12x12 cm de diâmetro. A paciente apresentava fraqueza notável, desconforto e dor na região subcostal esquerda. Em resposta às suas queixas e após avaliação minuciosa, optamos por um procedimento cirúrgico que incluiu pancreatectomia distal associada a esplenectomia e ressecção do aneurisma gigante da artéria esplênica.

Manejo anestésico en hipoglucemia hiperinsulinémica del recién nacido / Anesthetic management of hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia in the newborn

Resumen: La hipoglucemia hiperinsulinémica del recién nacido es una enfermedad hereditaria que cursa con alteraciones en las células pancreáticas; la incidencia estimada es de 1/50,000 nacidos vivos aumentando en casos de consanguinidad. Patología considerada como causa principal de hipoglucemias en este grupo etario con alto riesgo de daño cerebral y retraso mental que impacta significativamente en el neurodesarrollo. La euglucemia y la prevención de lesión cerebral por neuroglucopenia son los principales objetivos del tratamiento médico. Durante el transanestésico de una pancreatectomía, los niveles de glucosa son de utilidad como marcadores; el objetivo del abordaje perioperatorio es mantener estabilidad hemodinámica y euglucemia a través de un adecuado manejo de líquidos. Se presenta el caso de paciente femenino de dos meses de edad con diagnóstico de hipoglucemia hiperinsulinémica con hipoglucemias severas asociadas a crisis convulsivas, ingresa a quirófano para pancreatectomía subtotal.

Abstract: Hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia of the newborn is a hereditary disease that presents with alterations in pancreatic cells; the estimated incidence is 1/50,000 newly borns increasing in cases of consanguinity. Pathology considered as the main cause of hypoglycemia in this age group with a high risk of brain damage and mental retardation, significantly impacting neurodevelopment. Euglycemia and the prevention of brain injury from neuroglucopenia are the main objectives of medical treatment. During the transanesthetic of a pancreatectomy, the glucose levels are useful as markers; the objective of the perioperative management is to keep hemodynamic stability and euglycemia through proper fluid handling. In this case report we present a two-month-old female patient with a diagnosis of hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia with severe hypoglycemia associated with seizures that enters the operating room for subtotal pancreatectomy.

Tinción de Gram intraoperatoria en bilis para la prevención de complicaciones infecciosas en la duodenopancreatectomía / Intraoperative gram staining of bile for the prevention of infectious complications in pancreaticoduodenectomy

Introducción Las complicaciones infecciosas presentan un papel destacado en la duodenopancreatectomía. Su incidencia aumenta en casos con drenaje biliar preoperatorio (DBP), por el mayor riesgo de bacterobilia. Se presenta un estudio con el objetivo de valorar un protocolo de antibioterapia guiado por una tinción de gram intraoperatoria de líquido biliar. Métodos Estudio retrospectivo en el que se analiza la incidencia de complicaciones infecciosas entre dos grupos de 25 pacientes, consecutivos en el tiempo, intervenidos de duodenopancreatectomía. En el grupo 1 se administró profilaxis con cefazolina en pacientes sin DBP y antibioterapia durante cinco días con piperacilina-tazobactam en casos con DBP. En el grupo 2 se realizó tinción de gram intraoperatoria de bilis de forma sistemática. Si no se detectaban microorganismos, la antibioterapia se limitaba a profilaxis con cefazolina. Si se apreciaba bacterobilia, se administraba antibioterapia dirigida durante cinco días. Resultados La incidencia de infección órgano-cavitaria fue del 24% en el grupo 1 y del 4% en el 2 (p=0,04) y la incidencia de sepsis fue del 32% en el primer grupo y del 4% en el segundo (p=0,01). No se apreciaron diferencias en el resto de variables de morbimortalidad. Los microorganismos más prevalentes en bilis fueron Enterococcus spp y Klebsiella spp. En cultivos postoperatorios, aunque también fueron los más frecuentes en el grupo 1 (28 y 24%), solo aparecieron en el 4% de los casos del grupo 2 (p<0,05) Conclusión La tinción de gram intraoperatoria de bilis podría ser útil para dirigir la antibioterapia en la duodenopancreatectomía y contribuir a reducir las complicaciones infecciosas (AU)

Introduction Infectious complications play a prominent role in pancreaticoduodenectomy. Their incidence increases in cases with preoperative biliary drainage (PBD), due to the higher risk of bacterobilia. The aim of this study is to evaluate an antibiotherapy protocol based on intraoperative gram staining of bile and its impact on postoperative infectious complications. Methods A retrospective study analysing the incidence of infectious complications between two groups of 25 consecutive patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. In group 1, cefazolin prophylaxis was administered to patients without PBD. In cases with PBD a five days antibiotherapy with piperacillin-tazobactam was administered. In group 2, intraoperative gram staining of bile was routinely performed. If no microorganisms were detected, antibiotherapy was limited to cefazolin prophylaxis. If bacterobilia was detected, targeted antibiotherapy was administered for five days. Results The incidence of sepsis and organ/space infection in group 2 was 4% compared to 32% and 24% in group 1 respectively (p<0.05). No differences were observed in the remaining morbimortality variables. The most prevalent microorganisms in bile were Enterococcus spp and Klebsiella spp. In postoperative samples, they only appeared in 4% of cases in group 2 (p<0.05), in favour of S. epidermidis, although they were also prevalent in group 1 (28 and 24% respectively). Conclusion Intraoperative gram staining of bile fluid could be a useful tool to conduct personalised antibiotic therapy in pancreaticoduodenectomy and contribute to the control of infectious complications (AU)

Distal pancreatectomy: experience in a National Hospital.

AIMS: To compare the short-term outcomes of patients undergoing open DP (ODP) and laparoscopic DP (LDP); and to analyze the association between the section site of the pancreas and pancreatic fistula. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical, perioperative, and histopathologic data of patients who underwent ODP and LDP between 2009 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: 70 patients were included. 39 (56%) underwent ODP and 31 (44%) underwent LDP. The tumor size in ODP group was 70mm and in LDP group was 45mm (p = 0,032) Blood loss was lower in LDP group (229mL versus 498mL) (p = 0,001). Operative time, spleen preservation, B/C pancreatic fistula, major morbidity, reoperation, and length of hospital stay, were similar in both groups. There was no postoperative mortality. No differences were found in B/C pancreatic fistula rate regarding to pancreatic transection site. CONCLUSIONS: LDP is a safe procedure, with perioperative outcomes similar to ODP and with less blood loss. The pancreatic transection site did not influence post-operative pancreatic fistula rate.

OBJETIVOS: Comparar los resultados a corto plazo de pacientes intervenidos mediante pancreatectomía distal abierta (PDA) y laparoscópica (PDL); y analizar si el lugar de la sección del páncreas tiene relación con la formación de fístula pancreática. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Serie retrospectiva y descriptiva de las PD realizadas, desde enero del 2009 a diciembre del 2019. Se compararon las características clínicas, perioperatorias e histopatológicas de pacientes con PDA y PDL. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 70 pacientes. Treinta y nueve casos (56%) con PDA y 31 casos (44%) con PDL. El tamaño tumoral promedio en la PDA fue de 70 mm y en la PDL 45 mm (p = 0.032). La pérdida sanguínea fue menor en la PDL (229 vs. 498 ml) (p = 0.001). No se encontró diferencia significativa en tiempo operatorio, porcentaje de preservación esplénica, fístula pancreática B/C, reoperación, morbilidad mayor y estancia hospitalaria. No hubo mortalidad postoperatoria. No hubo diferencias en la formación de fístula pancreática con respecto al lugar de sección del páncreas. CONCLUSIONES: La PDL es un procedimiento seguro, con resultados perioperatorios similares a la PDA y con menor pérdida sanguínea. El lugar de sección del páncreas no tuvo relación con la formación de fístula pancreática.

Intraoperative gram staining of bile for the prevention of infectious complications in pancreaticoduodenectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Infectious complications play a prominent role in pancreaticoduodenectomy. Their incidence increases in cases with preoperative biliary drainage (PBD), due to the higher risk of bacterobilia. The aim of this study is to evaluate an antibiotherapy protocol based on intraoperative gram staining of bile and its impact on postoperative infectious complications. METHODS: A retrospective study analysing the incidence of infectious complications between two groups of 25 consecutive patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. In group 1, cefazolin prophylaxis was administered to patients without PBD. In cases with PBD a five days antibiotherapy with piperacillin-tazobactam was administered. In group 2, intraoperative gram staining of bile was routinely performed. If no microorganisms were detected, antibiotherapy was limited to cefazolin prophylaxis. If bacterobilia was detected, targeted antibiotherapy was administered for five days. RESULTS: The incidence of sepsis and organ/space infection in group 2 was 4% compared to 32% and 24% in group 1 respectively (p < 0.05). No differences were observed in the remaining morbimortality variables. The most prevalent microorganisms in bile were Enterococcus spp. and Klebsiella spp. In postoperative samples, they only appeared in 4% of cases in group 2 (p < 0.05), in favour of S. epidermidis, although they were also prevalent in group 1 (28 and 24% respectively). CONCLUSION: Intraoperative gram staining of bile fluid could be a useful tool to conduct personalised antibiotic therapy in pancreaticoduodenectomy and contribute to the control of infectious complications.

Desafío y futuro de la cirugía robótica hepática y pancreática. Análisis de 64 casos en una unidad especializada / Challenge and future of liver and pancreatic robotic surgery. Analysis of 64 cases in a specialized unit

Introducción: La cirugía robótica ha demostrado su eficacia en ciertos procedimientos quirúrgicos. Sin embargo, en cirugía hepática y pancreática (HBP) su uso es todavía poco frecuente. Se presenta la experiencia inicial en cirugía robótica HBP de una unidad especializada en un hospital de tercer nivel. Método: Se han estudiado en forma prospectiva los resultados de los pacientes intervenidos de cirugía HBP robótica entre abril de 2018 y octubre de 2020. Los datos analizados corresponden a datos demográficos, técnicas quirúrgicas realizadas y morbimortalidad asociada. Resultados Se intervinieron 64 pacientes, sometidos a 35 hepatectomías (mayores [6,7%], anatómicas [52,9%], limitadas [34,4%], quistectomías [3%] y marsupializaciones [3%]) y 29 pancreatectomías/resecciones duodenales (distales [48,2%], centrales [6,9%], cefálicas [13,8%], enucleaciones [24,1%], ampulectomías [3,5%] y resecciones duodenales [3,5%]).En cirugía hepática el tiempo operatorio medio fue de 204,4 minutos (100-265 min), la mediana de complicaciones postoperatorias según la escala de Clavien-Dindo fue de uno (1-4), las pérdidas hemáticas medias de 166,7 mL (100-300 mL), no existió conversión y la estancia postoperatoria media de cuatro días (2-14 días).En cirugía pancreática el tiempo operatorio medio fue de 243,8 minutos (125-460 min), la mediana de complicaciones postoperatorias de dos (1-4), las pérdidas hemáticas de 202,3 mL (100-500 mL) asociadas a una tasa de conversión del 17,8% y una estancia media de siete días (3-23 días). Conclusiones: La cirugía robótica HBP es segura y factible. Se sugiere que su uso facilita la cirugía conservadora de parénquima, el acceso a segmentos posteriores hepáticos y la realización de anastomosis en la reconstrucción pancreática respecto a la cirugía laparoscópica (AU)

Introduction: Robotic surgery has proven effective in certain surgical procedures. However, in liver and pancreatic surgery (HBP) its use is still rare. The initial experience in HBP robotic surgery of a specialized unit of a tertiary hospital is presented. results of patients undergoing robotic HBP surgery between April 2018 and October 2020 have been prospectively studied. The data analyzed correspond to demographic data, surgical techniques performed, associated morbidity and mortality.Results64 patients were operated, corresponding to 35 hepatectomies (major [6.7%], anatomic [52.9%], limited [34.4%], cystectomies [3%] and marsupialization [3%]), 29 pancreatectomies (distal [48.2%], central [6.9%], cephalic [13.8%], enucleations [24.1%], ampullectomies [3.5%] and duodenal resections [3.5%]).In liver surgery the mean operative time was 204.4 minutes (100-265 min), the median postoperative complications according to the Clavien-Dindo scale was one (1-4), the mean blood losses 166.7 mL (100-300 mL), there was no conversion and the mean postoperative stay was four days (2-14 days).In pancreatic surgery, the mean operative time was 243.8 minutes (125-460 min), the median of postoperative complications was two (1-4), blood loss of 202.3 mL (100-500 mL) associated to a conversion rate 17.8% and an average stay of seven days (3-23 days).Conclusions: Robotic HBP surgery is safe and feasible. It is suggested that its use facilitates parenchymal sparing surgery, access to posterior liver segments and anastomosis in pancreatic reconstruction compared to laparoscopic surgery (AU)

Challenge and future of liver and pancreatic robotic surgery. Analysis of 64 cases in a specialized unit.

INTRODUCTION: Robotic surgery has proven effective in certain surgical procedures. However, in liver and pancreatic surgery (HBP) its use is still rare. The initial experience in HBP robotic surgery of a specialized unit of a tertiary hospital is presented. METHOD: The results of patients undergoing robotic HBP surgery between April 2018 and October 2020 have been prospectively studied. The data analyzed correspond to demographic data, surgical techniques performed, associated morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: 64 patients were operated, corresponding to 35 hepatectomies (major [6.7%], anatomic [52.9%], limited [34.4%], cystectomies [3%] and marsupialization [3%]), 29 pancreatectomies (distal [48.2%], central [6.9%], cephalic [13.8%], enucleations [24.1%], ampullectomies [3.5%] and duodenal resections [3.5%]). In liver surgery the mean operative time was 204.4 min (100-265 min), the median postoperative complications according to the Clavien-Dindo scale was one (1-4), the mean blood losses 166.7 mL (100-300 mL), there was no conversion and the mean postoperative stay was four days (2-14 days). In pancreatic surgery, the mean operative time was 243.8 min (125-460 min), the median of postoperative complications was two (1-4), blood loss of 202.3 mL (100-500 mL) associated to a conversion rate 17.8% and an average stay of seven days (3-23 days). CONCLUSIONS: Robotic HBP surgery is safe and feasible. It is suggested that its use facilitates parenchymal sparing surgery, access to posterior liver segments and anastomosis in pancreatic reconstruction compared to laparoscopic surgery.

How to perform laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy using the clockwise technique / Como realizar a pancreatectomia distal laparoscópica usando a clockwise technique

ABSTRACT - BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic pancreatectomy is currently a widely used approach for benign and malignant lesions of the pancreas. AIMS: This study aimed to describe how to perform a laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy using The Clockwise Technique. METHODS: An 18-year-old female patient presented with a well-defined tumor in the pancreatic body with 4 cm in diameter that suggested a diagnosis of solid pseudopapillary tumor (Frantz's tumor). The patient was recommended for laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy by using The Clockwise Technique. RESULTS: The clockwise, caudal-to-cephalic approach appears to have other significant technical advantages that facilitate the performance of the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: A laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy performed using The Clockwise Technique provides satisfactory outcomes.

RESUMO - RACIONAL: A pancreatectomia laparoscópica está se tornando uma abordagem amplamente usada para lesões benignas e malignas do pâncreas. OBJETIVOS: Descrever como realizar a pancreatectomia distal laparoscópica usando a Clockwise Technique. MÉTODOS: Paciente feminina com 18 anos de idade, apresentando tumor bem definido no corpo pancreático com 4 cm de diâmetro que sugeria o diagnóstico de tumor sólido pseudopapilar (tumor de Frantz). O paciente foi considerado para pancreatectomia distal laparoscópica pela Clockwise Technique. RESULTADOS: A Clockwise Technique parece apresentar outras vantagens técnicas significativas que facilitam a realização do procedimento. CONCLUSÕES: A pancreatectomia distal laparoscópica foi realizada com a clockwise technique, obtendo-se resultados satisfatórios.